Strapping Bands vs Cable Cleats Featured Image
Strapping Bands vs Cable Cleats Banner

Defined by the IEC International standard, a cable cleat is simply:

“A device designed to secure cables when installed at intervals along the length of the cables”

However, even though the standard does require the manufacturer to describe a material type, it does not exclude any specific material, dictate any minimum dimensions or physical attributes. Annex A (informative) in the IEC cable cleat standard provides examples of various cable cleats which include products made from timber, steel and plastic. There is a variety of designs and methods of ‘securing cables’, designs start at 15mm wide and go up to 150mm wide.

Cable cleats are required to follow IEC 61914:2015 standard, which is a high level outlining the methodology and testing criteria to successfully design.

Example of Cable Cleat

Figure 1: Examples of Cable Cleats

Providing that the manufacturer tests and declares certain performance criteria, a ‘cable cleat’ can be any shape, size or material. Hence, for example, a 19mm wide banding system can be used to secure cables in line with the IEC Cable Cleat standard providing it undergoes all the required tests and that they are carried out in accordance with the standard.

The term ‘cable tie’ is commonly used to describe a ‘strap cleat’ system which is not correct. A light duty stainless steel tie or an injection molded ‘zip’ tie has many uses and play a vital role on many cable routing installations, but they must not be confused with a high-end strap cleat solution which can withstand immensely high electro-mechanical forces and are resistant to corrosion and ultra violet degradation.

The Misconceptions About Strapping Bands

Misconception 1: A banding system cannot restrain the forces during a fault

Recent articles in the industry press suggest that a banding system is not capable of withstanding the
electromechanical forces and a series of video clips show an incorrectly specified cable tie installation failing during fault. The issue here is that the tested product was not suitable for the intended installation. It might well have been the case that this weaker tie was specified by the system designer, and here lies the true problem, an incorrect specification. The product used in the test was never designed to withstand these forces; a correctly specified and engineered banding system certainly would.

Example of an intentional short circuit fault during testing after

Figure 2: Example of an aftermath of an intentional short circuit fault during testing

To suggest that a strap banding system is not suitable for short circuit rated installations is incorrect and is out dated information. The cable system designer must make sure that the fault levels have been accurately calculated and then specify a fixing system which meets that requirement and complies fully to IEC 61914:2015.

Misconception 2: A banding system has sharp edges and will cut the installer during installation / damage the cable during fault conditions

As described previously, to achieve a successful short circuit test is difficult. After both the first and second short circuits each cable at every restraint position is inspected by test laboratory personnel; there can be no cuts or damage to the outer jacket. Furthermore, after the second short circuit the laboratory carry out the voltage withstand test to check for current leakage and any hidden damage which may have occurred underneath the band itself. Panduit’s extensive range of banding products have full certification to both classifications of short circuit test. The use of a protective sleeve moulding, common on many cleat types, and the use of rolled edge banding material ensures the cable is protected regardless of fault level. To suggest that this type of product is not suitable for short circuit rated installations because it will damage or cut the cable or cause cuts and injury to personnel is incorrect and out dated information.

electromagnetic forces during a short circuit event

Figure 2: Panduit ANSYS simulation software showing electromagnetic forces during a short circuit event.

Other advantages of Panduit’s Banding Systems

• When compared to a ‘traditional’ design of cable cleat the banding system has a much larger range taking ability. This is a huge advantage from a purchasing and stock keeping perspective; quite often one part number from a Banding System covers the same range take as perhaps four or five ‘traditional’ cleat part numbers.

• A banding system takes up minimum space when installed around the cables. This is a very important factor when space is limited e.g. across the width of a ladder rung or when available height is limited e.g. between layers of ladder runs.

• A fault rated band will be typically less expensive to buy and quicker to install.

• A large quantity of banding system products takes up much less physical space on site before installation compared to ‘traditional’ cleat systems. This also leads to less packaging, less waste and generally a lower carbon footprint.